University of South Alabama Acceptance Rate, SAT/ACT Scores, GPA

The University of South Alabama is a public research university  with an acceptance rate of 79%. Located in Mobile, Alabama, USA is comprised of more than 100 programs within nine colleges. Popular undergraduate majors include health, business, education, and engineering. USA has an 18-to-1 student / faculty ratio and an average class size of 24. Outside of the classroom, students can choose from over 200 clubs and activities ranging from academic honor societies, to recreational sports, to performing arts ensembles. In athletics, the University of South Alabama Jaguars compete in the NCAA Division I  Sun Belt Conference.   Considering applying to University of South Alabama? Here are the admissions statistics you should know, including average SAT/ACT scores and GPAs of admitted students. Acceptance Rate During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, the University of South Alabama had an acceptance rate of 79%. This means that for every 100 students who applied, 79 students were admitted, making USAs admissions process somewhat competitive. Admissions Statistics (2017-18) Number of Applicants 6,555 Percent Admitted 79% Percent Admitted Who Enrolled (Yield) 37% SAT Scores and Requirements The University of South Alabama requires that all applicants submit either SAT or ACT scores. During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, 9% of admitted students submitted SAT scores. SAT Range (Admitted Students) Section 25th Percentile 75th Percentile ERW 530 630 Math 510 610 ERW=Evidence-Based Reading and Writing This admissions data tells us that most of University of South Alabamas admitted students fall within the top 35% nationally on the SAT. For the evidence-based reading and writing section, 50% of USAs admitted students scored between 530 and 630, while 25% scored below 530 and 25% scored above 630. On the math section, 50% of admitted students scored between 510 and 610, while 25% scored below 510 and 25% scored above 610. Applicants with a composite SAT score of 1240 or higher will have particularly competitive chances at the University of South Alabama. Requirements The University of South Alabama does not require the SAT writing section or SAT Subject tests. Note that USA does not superscore SAT results; your highest composite SAT score will be considered. ACT Scores and Requirements The University of South Alabama requires that all applicants submit either SAT or ACT scores. During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, 94% of admitted students submitted ACT scores. ACT Range (Admitted Students) Section 25th Percentile 75th Percentile English 21 29 Math 19 26 Composite 21 27 This admissions data tells us that most of University of South Alabamas admitted students fall within the  top 42% nationally  on the ACT. The middle 50% of students admitted to USA received a composite ACT score between 21 and 27, while 25% scored above 27 and 25% scored below 21. Requirements The University of South Alabama does not superscore ACT results; your highest composite ACT score will be considered. The optional ACT writing section is not required by the University of South Alabama. GPA In 2018, the average high school GPA of the University of South Alabamas incoming freshmen class was 3.70, and nearly half of incoming students had average GPAs of 3.75 and above. These results suggest that most successful applicants to the University of South Alabama have primarily A grades. Admissions Chances The University of South Alabama, which accepts over three-quarters of applicants, has a somewhat selective admissions pool with above average grades and test scores.  If your SAT/ACT scores and GPA fall within the schools average range, you have a strong chance of being accepted. The University of South Alabama generally admits applicants with a minimum ACT composite score of 19 or above, a minimum SAT score of 990 or above, and a minimum GPA of 2.5 and above. However, USA also uses a  holistic admission  approach that considers academic achievement in  rigorous coursework. Potential applicants should have a minimum of four years of English; three years of math; three years of natural science (including 2 with lab component), three years of social science, and three years of advanced electives. Applicants with extenuating circumstances who do not meet USAs admission standards may file an appeal and submit additional information to be considered for admission. The University of South Alabama will consider letters of recommendation, personal essays, and resumes which describe special talents and skills in the appeal process.  Students with particularly compelling stories or achievements can still receive serious consideration even if their grades and test scores are outside the University of South Alabamas average range. If You Like University of South Alabama, You May Also Like These Schools University of MobileSamford UniversityFlorida State UniversitySewanee - University of the SouthAuburn UniversityMississippi State University All admissions data has been sourced from the National Center for Education Statistics and University of South Alabama Undergraduate Admissions Office.

Aristotle on Justice - 2000 Words

In this paper, I shall address two central contemporary criticisms of Aristotles conception of justice. These criticisms of Aristotles account of specific justice have focused on two central problems. First, Aristotles insistence that all specifically unjust actions are motivated by pleonexia Pleonexia can be understood as the desire to have more of some socially availablegood, and is usually translated as greed or acquisitiveness. Close . Second, Aristotle does not identify a deficient vice with respect to justice. This violates his golden mean doctrine with respect to virtue. Without the identification of the deficient vice with respect to justice, then justice must not be a virtue of character. Due to considerations of†¦show more content†¦Defending ones home, fighting against invaders, when they are attacking the state to preserve ones family and friends is an example of the application of these qualifications on the virtue of courage. Considering how this action affects the overall well being of others, we are considering how the action is generally just. In sum, the distinction being made here is that the same virtue can be seen all by itself, as a part of the character of an individual only, and where the virtue is in relation to another person in a particular political community, and its effects on the well being of others in that political community. We have the same state considered from dif ferent perspectives. Aristotle says that justice is spoken of in two ways: as lawful and as fair. I will discuss general justice first in order to distinguish it from specific justice. Generally speaking, general justice is concerned with the common good of the community. In the Politics, Aristotle refers to justice as being a communal virtue. Similarly, then, we shall say that virtue has a just claim in the dispute, since [general] justice, we say, is a communal (koinoniken) virtue, which all the other virtues necessarily accompany (Pol.1283a36-39 trans. Reeve [modified]). This communal or relational aspect of justice shows up both in general and specific justice. I shall discuss the communal orShow MoreRelatedGreek Justice : Plato And Aristotle1085 Words   |  5 PagesPhilosophers and Justice as the Greek World Expands in 400-150 BCE Justice could be the defined as the quality of being fair and reasonable, during the period of 400-150 BCE when the Greek civilization was being formed. Plato and Aristotle are philosphers, who are leading figures of ancient Greek civilization and both discussed justice and established theories about the views of being just. Plato was a student of Socrates, and Aristotle was a student of Plato. Aristotle and Plato had differentRead MorePlato And Aristotle On Justice And Law1565 Words   |  7 Pages Plato and Aristotle lived in a time where rule of man was the common practice in government. Under the system of the rule of man, citizens are governed by an individual or small group of rulers. On the other hand, the idea of the rule of law is one that proposes that laws should be supreme over each citizen including the ruler(s). In their writings, Plato and Aristotle focused on justice and law, and the reasons they are important in society. Throughout history, many leaders have looked to theseRead MoreAristotle s Views On Justice2537 Words   |  11 PagesAristotle on Justice as Equality Aristotle forwards the view that justice is equality. Crucial to his view of equality is that equality means treating what is similar similarly and what is dissimilar dissimilarly. This is as opposed to more modern understandings of equality which maintain overlooking relevant dissimilarities. However, there is an apparent emptiness to Aristotle’s idea of equality, for in any difference of treatment between individuals or groups there is always some difference betweenRead MoreAristotle s Views On Justice Essay1904 Words   |  8 PagesThe philosophical argument of what defines justice is a debate that has persisted since the origins of human society. Socrates in Plato’s Republic states that â€Å"So long as I do not know what the just is, I shall hardly know whether it is a virtue or not and whether the one who has it is unhappy or happy†(The Republic, Pg 34). Without knowledge on what justice means, it is impossible to determine if an action is good or bad. Ari stotle views Justice as an appropriate balance of virtues away from vicesRead MoreAristotle And Kant s Theory Of Justice1327 Words   |  6 Pages To compare philosophers Aristotle and Immanuel Kant is essentially to compare modern philosophy to classic philosophy. Aristotle’s theory of justice links together ethics and politics; while Kant’s theory of justice is based on strictly defined principles of morality. Modern philosopher Michael J. Sandel provides a detailed analysis of each theory in his book Justice: What’s the Right Thing to do? Although the key features of Aristotle’s and Kant’s theories are mostly different in nature, thereRead MoreJustice: Plato vs. Aristotle Essay1024 Words   |  5 Pagesand Aristotle, arguably the most important philosophers of their time, both made attempts to define justice. Being that Aristotle was a student of Plato, their ideas share many similarities. Both viewed justice as the harmonious interaction of p eople in a society. However, Plato defined his ideal of justice with more usage of metaphysics, invoking his Form of the Good, while Aristotle took a more practical approach, speaking in terms of money and balance. Although Aristotles ideal of justice mayRead MoreAristotle s Views On Morality And Justice Essay2066 Words   |  9 PagesIntroduction Aristotle is considered one of, if not the greatest, philosophers of all time. This paper will discuss Aristotle’s understanding of the relationship between ethics and justice, ethical philosophies interpreted by other, but distinct, philosophers, Aristotle’s virtue theory and justice philosophy, as discussed in his book, Nicomachean Ethics: Book V, and how western ethics and justice concepts effect existing American civil and criminal justice systems. Ethics and Justice AccordingRead MoreAristotle and Plato: Death Action and Justice1284 Words   |  5 PagesAristotle and Plato: Death, Action and Justice Ancient philosophers wrestled considerably with the questions of right and wrong, good and evil, just and unjust. The struggle to understand and define these various dynamics was cast into constant debate, especially in the context of the pagan and imperial Athenian state. Here, thinkers such as Socrates, Plato and Aristotle would continually advance the discussion on how best to define man, both practically and ethically. In the two prompting statementsRead MoreA Theory Of Justice And If Aristotle Ran General Motors1684 Words   |  7 Pagessuccess. If I were to create my own business I would attempt to create a culture in which the employees and community respected my business and the work I tried to accomplish for the community. Through the work of John Rawl’s, â€Å"A Theory of Justice† and â€Å"If Aristotle Ran General Motors† I have created a list of values that I would uphold in my own business in order to ensure a culture that promotes this type of suc cess. These values I would advocate for are honesty, communication, compassion, and beautyRead MoreA Definition Of Justice By Aristotle And The Star Spangled Banner2010 Words   |  9 Pagessociety has gained their independence by creating justice for themselves while producing inequalities for others; some affected by â€Å"justice† were people with different ideas than government, slaves, women and free African-Americans. Aristotle’s â€Å"A Definition of Justice† describes the differences of the state with an oligarchy and democracy as government. In both systems of government, Aristotle states men have a misconception of justice. â€Å"Justice is thought by them to be, and is, equality, not, however

Cultural Differences Betterment of the Society

Question: Describe about the Cultural Differences for Betterment of the Society. Answer: Introduction Cultural differences refer to the differences among people in terms of their beliefs, values, convictions, behaviors, definitions of right and wrong, ethics etc. Such differences can make the same action or activity to be considered as good in one society while offending and selfish in another society (Price, 2013). Culture is something, which can be seen as a consequence of civilization of people, mythical stories, folk tales and continuous history. And cultural differences arise between countries as different countries share different histories, evolution and mythical stories (Verbeke, 2010). It is very important to study and understand these differences because of its wide applications in different aspects of life and growing popularity. Business corporates need to understand cultural differences to formulate their strategy in different countries. Historical studies make references of cultural differences to validate and research on history (Vianelli, 2013). Marketing activities n eed to understand cultural differences so as to make advertising more appealing in different countries without hurting any community. Cultural differences are also important area of research for Phycologists. Such differences have wide application in political, economic areas of any country (Abdullah, 2009). They are used to establish peach also. The objective of this report is to discuss the cultural differences between China and USA. Analysis: Cultural Differences It is also very important to know the strengths and weaknesses of each culture, their diversity and how they can be leveraged in the betterment of the society as a whole. Also, some cultures converge in some of the areas raising a question if the cultures share same history. In course of this report, cultural differences the top 2 economies of the world i.e. between China and US will be compared (Meissner, 2012). Hofstedes develops a very powerful model to study and understand cultural differences. Initially, this model has 4 dimensions to study the cultural differences but it has been refined over a period of time and now it has 6 dimensions. This model is accepted worldwide. China and USA countries will be compared based on the 6 dimensions suggested by Hofstede. Power distance Index Power distance refers to the degree to which people accepts the unequal power distribution in the society. This index actually suggests societys level of inequality, which is endorsed and accepted by both followers as well as leaders. Power distance in China is very high i.e. 80 as compared to 40 in US. Worlds average of this power index is 55. High power index for China simply means that high level of inequality is accepted by society in China. It means that people are influenced by the formal authority and nothing much can be done in case of power abuse by those having higher powers. It can also imply a hierarchical structure. People also liked to be led by the leaders (Bos, Brockner, Oudenalder, Kamble, Nasabi, 2013). This is quite high as compared to power index of US, which is very low. Low power index in US means that there is higher degree of equality among people in government, business organizations and families. This means the structure is flat and there are not many rules and regulations prepared separately for different sections of society. Individualism This refers to the degree of interdependence among people in a society. In individualistic societies, people generally think of themselves above the group and are not concerned much about society. In collectivist societies, people cooperate with each other in-group, socialize together and share strong bond between them (Razak, 2016). China has very low score of 20 compared to US, which has very high score of 91. This means that people in US are much more professional and task oriented while in China, people are relationship oriented. Also, people in china have huge social circle because of collectivism and prefers to celebrate festivals with their families and friends while in People in US have very limited social circles and prefer to celebrate with their direct families. People in US keep their professional and personnel life separate while this is not the case in China. An ALs, US person stress more on privacy and individual achievements and does not care much about reputation and their image in society (Beck, 2014). On the other hand, people in china are too much concerned about their image in the society and take reputation very seriously. Masculinity Masculine attributes are strength, achievements, success, competitions, assertiveness and Feminine attributes are relationship oriented, quality of life, caring, showing concern for others. Masculine societies prefer to manage the conflicts through war and force while feminine societies prefer negotiations. Societies having higher masculine score generally have higher masculine attributes and there is not much overlapping between the males and females section of society. There are roles and responsibilities clearly defined for males and females. On the other hand, Feminine societies have higher level of overlapping between males and females. This index is high for both China and US. That means people in China and US identified themselves with the words like Success, competition. This score is higher for China as compared to US which also implies that Chinese works more to earn more and achieve success and sacrifice their leisure to spend time at work. Masculine dominated societies also have strong feelings of egos and competition and concerned about their career. Uncertainty avoidance index It refers to the degree to which people feel threatened by uncertainty and try to control the uncertainty by controlling it. The score of China for uncertainty avoidance index is very low as compared to US. This means that china societies have less sense of urgency and comfortable in dealing with unknown. Chinese are open to embrace change and inclined towards open-ended decision-making. Also, Titles are not given much importance and showing off should be avoidable. US have higher score and they try to control life. Societies with higher score uncertainty avoidance tend to be more stressful as people tends to control everything no matter it is in their control or not. In US, people tend to be more logical, scientific and reasonable in accepting the various ideas while in china it is not the case. People in US will not believe in historical truths, spirituality unless they see the logic in that. They are more scientific in their approach and always look for a reason (Talhel,, Zhang, O ishi, Shimin, Duan, Lan, Kityama, 2014). Such societies are more innovative because they question the status quo. People in China are more traditional and conservative in believing the folk tales and trust their ancestors. Long-term orientation It refers to degree to which society maintain and uphold its traditions in past in dealing with the future situations. This score is very high in china and very low in US. Societies having high long-term orientation score tend to be more pragmatic and believe that truth depends on time and circumstances. People are modest; ask questions and more willing to compromise. They avoid self-obsession. US have very low score on long term orientation which means that people take themselves very seriously and always ready to oversell themselves which means they are self obsessed. Also, People are not much willing to compromise, as compromise is perceived as an attribute of weak. In US, people are more concerned with quick profits and short term gains as compared to long term gains while in China, there is culture of saving quite popular as people tends to think about long term. Indulgence Indulgences refer to the degree to which people try to control whims and desires and instant gratification. US have a very high score of indulgence while China score low on this parameter. This means that people in US have less control over their whims and desires while people in China have more control over their desires and does not believe much in instant gratification (Heslop, 2014). This is the reason people in US tend to enjoy leisure more, went to travel around world more, enjoy their food and drinks in pubs and does not save much money for future. It can also be said that US people not able to save because of weak controls and their inability to control themselves. People in china do not give much importance to leisure time and control their desires and gratification (Bishop, Hoang, Bone, Steinberg, 2016). Chinese have the ability to save money for future and thus does not spend much in leisure and enjoyment activities. Some other common Cultural differences Apart from parameters defined by Hofstedes model, there are other cultural differences also. Lets look at few: Empathy People in China are very empathetic towards the needs of others. People will put themselves in shoes of each other to understand the situation from others point of view. They treat other people well and also like to be treated well (Valencia, 2011). However, culture in US is not very empathetic towards the needs of others. This can also be explained by Individualism Vs collectivism parameter of Hofstede model. In china, People prefer to be a part of group (Moran, Abramson, Moran, 2014). In US, People look for high IQ (intelligence quotient) while in China people prefer to have high EQ (Emotional intelligence). Time sensitivity People in US are very professional and committed to their deadlines much more than Chinese. Chinese have little laid back attitude in this respect. If someone joins the meeting late by 10, 15 minutes, it is perfectly acceptable in China unlike US (Ahadi, Rothbart, Ye, 1993). Respect to ancestors People stay with their elders in China while it is not the case in US. From the early age, everyone prefers independence and people generally dont stay with their parents after 18-19 years of age (Frost, 2011). There are many traditions in China where people respect their ancestors, visit the grave of dead people once a year and pay their honor. Desire to showoff and consumerism: In chine, People are not ostentatious as compared to the people in US. That is why; Consumerism is very high in US as people have the nature to buy the things to show off even when they dont need it (Rallapalli, Montgomery, 2015). Also, buying by taking loans is more common in US as compared to Chinese society. In chine, there is a culture of saving and people buy once they save enough is more common. In US, people easily take loans because of their inability to control their whims and desires and also show off. This can also be explained by the parameter of Indulgence of Hofstedes model. Brand trust Organizations in China have faced lot of quality issues in the past and hence lose their credibility. Though, Chinese products are cheap but there is often substandard, cheap raw material copied and influenced by something expensive. Chinese have copied all the expensive US brands and selling them at very cheap price in local markets. Chinese tends to imitate (Rallapalli, Montgomery, 2015). In US, Innovation is more and also quality is also really very high. Health Conscious People is US are not very health conscious and eats lot of processed foods. Obesity and Diabetes is very common in US. In China, People dont prefer to eat processed foods. Instead they cook fresh food every time. They are more health conscious and believe in living balanced life. Divorce rates Divorce is much more popular in US culture as compared to China. In US, people dont hesitate to take divorce if there is any trouble since people dont care much about their reputation and image in the society. However, in china, divorce rate is very low (Meisel, Ning, Campbell, Goodie, 2016). People generally avoid their decisions to take divorce in small matters. They take divorce unless it is absolutely necessary. People who are divorced are looked down in the society and Chinese people are very much conscious about their reputation and image in the society. Social structure In china, political and social structure is hierarchical and formal and people generally socialized with the people in their structures while in US, it is not uncommon to see people socializing with anyone as there are not many rules and structure is more loose and informal. In China, even on business organizations, families and corporations, there is strict hierarchical structure. Parents make decision for their children on their behalf however in US, the structure is more kind of flat and there is greater comfort level between parents and children, management and employees. All the decisions involve discussion. In US, parents do make decisions for their children. In fact, rules are very strict in US, children can complain to police also if parents are trying to force their decisions on children (Su, Li, Lin, Xu, Zhu, 2013). In organizations, also management involves employees in discussion before taking decisions. Conflict Management In US, People manage conflict by confronting each other face to face. Debates and arguments are very much possible. However, this is not the case in China. In China, lot of things like power, position, and respect goes along with the conflict management. People tend to avoid conflicts with those who have higher power and position no matter what the truth is. Business relations In US, business meetings tend to focus more on agenda and business problem rather than socializing. In China, people socialize with each other, spends time with each other even in business relations. In US, while hiring, merit and skills are given much more importance. In china, referrals and contacts are also required to get a job along with a good feedback from previous employers (Bedford, 2016). Morals Chinese are high on morals be it religious or ethical. There are not rules but inherent in society due to reputation that dating is not much encouraged at young age. In American culture, there is complete freedom about dating, marriages and divorces. People generally dont care about society while taking decisions. Conclusion Based on the above discussion it can be said that both USA and China have different cultures. USA is a developed nations and China would have a lot of benchmarking to done against the cultural factors or cultural attributes of USA that make it an advanced nation. The global markets and international trade has emerge as a platform where the cultural gaps could be minimized. It is expected that the culture of these two countries would see some convergence as the global market continues to expand and international trade continue to increase. References Alon, I., Jaffe, E., Vianelli, D. (2013).Global marketing: contemporary theory, practice, and cases. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, c2013. xxi, 602 pages: illustrations, maps; 26 cm. Ali, H., Azimah Chew Abdullah, N., Subramaniam, C. (2009). Management practice in safety culture and its influence on workplace injury: An industrial study in Malaysia.Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal,18(5), 470-477. Retrieved form: https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/09653560911003660 Ahadi, S. A., Rothbart, M. K., Ye, R. (1993). Children's temperament in the US and China: Similarities and differences. European Journal of Personality, 7(5), 359-378. Bedford, O. (2016). Crossing Boundaries An Exploration of Business Socializing (Ying Chou for Guanxi) in a Chinese Society. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 290-306. Bishop, H., Hoang, D. T., Boone, C., Steinberg, D. H. (2016, January). CUSTOMER SERVICE HOFSTEDES CULTURAL DIMENSIONS IN CHINA THE USA AMONG ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROFESSIONALS. In Allied Academies International Conference. Academy of Management Information and Decision Sciences. Proceedings (Vol. 20, No. 1, p. 2). Jordan Whitney Enterprises, Inc. https://www.geert-hofstede.com/ Meisel, M. K., Ning, H., Campbell, W. K., Goodie, A. S. (2016). Narcissism, Overconfidence, and Risk Taking in US and Chinese Student Samples. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(3), 385-400. Moran, R. T., Abramson, N. R., Moran, S. V. (2014). Managing cultural differences. Routledge. Meissner, H. G. (2012).Strategic international marketing. Springer Science Business Media. Martin, J., Frost, P. (2011). The organizational culture war games.Sociology of organizations: Structures and relationships,315. Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., Jimnez-Jimnez, D., Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture.Management Decision,49(1), 55-72. Ochieng, E. G., Price, A. D. F., Ruan, X., Egbu, C. O., Moore, D. (2013). The effect of cross-cultural uncertainty and complexity within multicultural construction teams.Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management,20(3), 307-324. Papadopoulos, N., Heslop, L. A. (2014).Product-country images: Impact and role in international marketing. Routledge. Rallapalli, K. C., Montgomery, C. D. (2015). Marketing Strategies For Asian-Americans: Guidelines Based on Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions. In Minority Marketing: Research Perspectives for the 1990s (pp. 73-77). Springer International Publishing. Samaha, S. A., Beck, J. T., Palmatier, R. W. (2014). The role of culture in international relationship marketing.Journal of Marketing,78(5), 78-98. Shafaei, A., Razak, N. A. (2016). International Postgraduate Students Cross-Cultural Adaptation in Malaysia: Antecedents and Outcomes.Research in Higher Education, 1-29. Su, S., Li, X., Lin, D., Xu, X., Zhu, M. (2013). Psychological adjustment among leftà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ behind children in rural China: the role of parental migration and parentchild communication. Child: care, health and development, 39(2), 162-170. Talhelm, T., Zhang, X., Oishi, S., Shimin, C., Duan, D., Lan, X., Kitayama, S. (2014). Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture. Science, 344(6184), 603-608. Tung, R. L., Verbeke, A. (2010). Beyond Hofstede and GLOBE: Improving the quality of cross-cultural research.Journal of International Business Studies,41(8), 1259-1274. Van den Bos, K., Brockner, J., van den Oudenalder, M., Kamble, S. V., Nasabi, A. (2013). Delineating a method to study cross-cultural differences with experimental control: The voice effect and countercultural contexts regarding power distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 624-634.

The History of Voting Essay Example For Students

The History of Voting Essay Throughout the history of the U.S., voting has been a very important part of the way that our country is run, because voting has been very important so then has been public opinion. The founding fathers were afraid of the opinions of a misinformed or ignorant public. Due to this fear they set up checks on public opinion such as the Electoral College. In this way it shows that in the 1700s as in the present that public opinion is very important and confusing. The authors Walter Lippmann, V.O. Key, Jr., George Gallup, James Prothro, and Charles Grigg all believe that public opinion is very important for the effect it as on the government. In Walter Lippmanns article The Pseudo-Environment of Public Opinion Lippmann believes that public opinion is very important because it can negatively sway how the government acts. We will write a custom essay on The History of Voting specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now He believes that public opinion can be swayed all too easily by the passions. In addition to that, Lippmann also believes that the publics perception of the world is not accurate in relation to the way that the world really is. Lippmann believes that the general public is ignorant so that for public opinion to be valid the public would have to be better educated. This article indicates that even if public opinion is misinformed or swayed by the passions it is still very important because of the impact it has on government. V.O. Key, Jr. also wrote an article on public opinion called Leaders Mold and Influence Public Opinion. This article is about how the countrys leaders shape public opinion. Key agrees in general with Lippmann in that public opinion can negatively affect government because the public is generally misinformed, ignorant, and that there beliefs are based on a pseudo-environment. Key believes that the leaders of this country should not strictly follow the will of the masses, and that the leaders should be the ones doing the leading. Contrary to Lippmann, Key writes that the public is misinformed because the government has given the people the wrong or misleading information. Also that the public is in a pseudo-environment because the government has lead the public astray, or given them wrong information either on purpose or not. Based on this reading it is fair to say that Key believes that the leaders should not always follow public opinion, but public opinion is still very important because the leaders should be keeping the public well informed sot that the people can make better choices. George Gallup writes in Polling the Public that public opinion is very important and can be judged by a variety of ways. Gallup believes that to gauge public opinion you should poll them asking them a variety of questions in order to get the publics opinion on any given matter. Contrary to Lippmann and Key, Gallup does not believe that public opinion is bad, that they are misinformed or that they are ignorant. In fact Gallup writes that public opinion is very good. Gallup believes this because that while the majority of the American people are not geniuses, they are smart people and their views should be listened to. It is fair to say that from this essay Gallup believes that in a democratic society the will of the people should be heard in order to maintain the democracy in the republic. Gallup shows that he believes public opinion is very important for the leaders to listen to, and can be understood through polling. James Prothro and Charles Grigg co-wrote an article entitled What do Americans Really Believe?. This article goes along the same general lines of the article written by George Gallup in respect to how the leaders should listen to the public. Prothro and Grigg both believe, as does Gallup that public opinion is very important and that the leaders of this country should listen to the voice of the people. .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed , .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed .postImageUrl , .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed , .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed:hover , .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed:visited , .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed:active { border:0!important; } .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed:active , .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u5c2502f0a1be499aa0cce532931373ed:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Product Layouts Essay One very important way that Prothro and Griggs article differs from Gallups article is that they believe it is hard to gauge public opinion. This leads to Prothro and Griggs main point: the masses can agree with the general, or abstract statement, but when you get into the small details about the statement people .